Legal Opinion

Hamm v. SEPTA

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided February 5, 1982No. 950Published

1Opinion of the Court

KALISH, J.,

I. FACTS

This case is before the court on the city’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.

Plaintiffs, Amaleda Hamm and John Hamm, allege in their complaint that on March 25, 1978, at about 3:00 pm, plaintiff, Amaleda Hamm, arrived at the Juniper Street exit in the concourse of the Philadelphia Subway system. Mrs. Hamm ascended the exit steps from the subway concourse, leading to the street, when she was allegedly assaulted and raped, suffering physical and psychic injuries.

Plaintiffs allege that at all times relevant to their complaint, SEPTA and/or the City of Philadelphia jointly…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public EducationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Gibson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Moran v. Valley Forge Drive-In Theater, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Murphy v. Penn Fruit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Honaman v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API