Legal Opinion

Southern Surety Co. v. Arter

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1932No. 1311—5814PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeddy, J.

The Industrial Accident Board made ar award in favor of John J. Arter, defendant in error, against the Southern Surety Company, who had issued a policy under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 8306 et seq.) to Arter’s employer.

As a predicate for an appeal to the district court, and within the time required by law, a notice signed by the Southern Surety Company and the Southern Surety Company of *914New York was filed with tlie Industrial Accident Board. This notice reads as follows:

“You are hereby notified tliat the Southern Surety Company of New York does not and will…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Orthwein v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Cooke v. CookeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  3. Winston v. MastersonTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Citt of Dallas v. Armour & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. State v. Tri-State Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Gunn v. CavanaughTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Mike Hooks, Inc. v. Gonzalo PenaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  3. Pratt v. Texas Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Middlebrook v. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Reynolds v. HawsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API