Legal Opinion

Alexander v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 1, 2003No. COA02-767PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Chief Judge.

Tony and Sarah Alexander, Roger and Penny Miller, Sharon Bell Rich and Donny and Debra Williams (“plaintiffs”) appeal from orders by the trial court entered on 13 and 19 February 2002. Plaintiffs argue that the orders were erroneous because: (1) plaintiffs did not need court approval before withdrawing their motion for class certification; (2) plaintiffs were not required to give notice of their intention to withdraw the motion for class certification; (3) the trial court did *639not have the authority to force plaintiffs and their attorneys to submit information regarding…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Culton v. CultonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. North Carolina Trust Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moody v. Sears Roebuck and Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  2. Alexander v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API