Legal Opinion

People v. Karberg

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 7, 2005No. 2-04-1000PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gilleran Johnson

The defendant, Matthew Karberg, was charged by information with harassment by telephone (720 ILCS 135/1 — 1(2) (West 2002)). On the defendant’s oral motion, the trial court dismissed the information, based on the fact that the telephone book distributed in the area did not contain the statutorily required warning against placing harassing phone calls. The State appeals from this dismissal. We reverse.

On January 13, 2004, the defendant was charged by information with telephone harassment (720 ILCS 135/1 — 1(2) (West 2002)) for allegedly placing a telephone call to Michelle Mayo, at her place…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Abrahamson v. Illinois Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Paris v. FederIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. PullenIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. HannaIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Utermehle v. NormentSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. AppelgrenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  2. People v. KucharskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  3. People v. NelsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  4. People v. AppelgrenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API