Joe Sanfelippo Cabs Inc. v. City of Milwaukee
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LYNN ADELMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, taxicab companies which own taxicab vehicle permits in the City of Milwaukee, challenge the constitutionality of a new city ordinance that removes the cap on the number of taxicab permits issued by the City and regulates new so-called rideshare companies like Uber and Lyft. Plaintiffs allege that parts of the ordinance violate their Fourteenth Amendment rights to substantive due process and equal protection and seek a preliminary injunction.
I. Background
For decades, the City of Milwaukee has capped the number of taxicab permits issued…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rhonda Ezell v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Wanda Goodpaster v. City of IndianapolisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Boston Taxi Owners Ass'n v. City of BostonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- Desoto Cab Co. v. PickerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Middleton Mixology LLC v. The Partnerships And Unincorporated Associations Identified On Schedule ADistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2025