Legal Opinion

Rutgers Casualty Insurance v. New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 24, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Carmen Klass was eligible for no fault PIP benefits as an “eligible injured person” under New Jersey Manufacturers’ (NJM) policy covering the car in which she was riding and the Rutgers Casualty (Rutgers) policy in which she was named insured. Rutgers appeals from the grant of summary judgment to NJM dismissing Rutgers’ declaratory judgment action seeking equitable pro-rata contribution from NJM and requiring its participation in arbitration. Rutgers claims entitlement to such relief under N.J.S.A. 39:6A-11 (section 11) and argues that enactment of N.J.S.A. 39:6A-4.2 (section 4.2) has no…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cokenakes v. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  2. USF & G v. Industrial Indem.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rutgers Casualty Insurance v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  2. Wilson, D. v. Snyder Brothers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. Wilson, D. v. Snyder Brothers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Wilson, D. v. Snyder Brothers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API