Legal Opinion

Brandt v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of Am.

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided February 27, 2019No. Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-3221Published

1Opinion of the Court

Andrew S. Hanen, United States District Judge

Before the Court are Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 19) filed by UNUM Life Insurance Company of America ("Unum" or "Defendant") and Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 20) filed by Henry Brandt ("Brandt" or "Plaintiff"). The parties have filed their various responses, replies, and sur-replies to each Motion.

The Court, having considered the various motions, responses, and replies and the corresponding summary judgment evidence, hereby denies Defendant's Motion and grants Plaintiff's Motion.

I. History of the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API