Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Granas

California Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1913No. L.A. No. 3084PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

The action was one for holding over after rent due and unpaid. The- court found upon abundant evidence sustaining said findings that David Abrams and James B. Meyer went into possession of the premises in question on the first day of September,. 1908, under a written lease for a term ending December 31, 1911; that the lease provided for certain definite ■amounts payable monthly in advance; that on December 1, 1908, Meyer transferred his interest in the lease to Abrams; that Abrams and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Agar v. WinslowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. McAlester v. LandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Skaggs v. EmersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Friend v. Oil Well Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pacific Insurance Associates, Ltd. v. Fashions, Inc.District Court, D. Guam · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API