Legal Opinion
Endte v. Hermes Export Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 28, 1957PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FREDERICK van PELT BRYAN, District Judge.
Defendants make companion motions (a) for an order directing plaintiff to submit to oral examination in New York pursuant to Rule 26, F.R.Civ.P. 28 U.S.C.A., and (b) for discovery and inspection pursuant to Rule 34, F.R.C.P.
Plaintiff is a citizen and resident of Austria and is not now, and, as far as appears, has never been in the United States. Defendants are citizens and residents of New York.
Plaintiff, engaged in the import and export business in Vienna, sues for breach of an agreement with defendants under which plaintiff was appointed as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Zweifler v. Sleco Laces, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Sullivan v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- United States v. Great Northern Railway Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1955
- Timblo v. Rhode Island InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
3Cited by5 opinions
- Salitan v. CarrilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Houdry Process Corp. v. Commonwealth Oil Refining Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
- Abdullah v. Sheridan Square Press, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
- Novel v. GarrisonDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
- Salitan v. CarrilloNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961