Legal Opinion
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 28, 2011No. Civil Action 99-2496 (GK)PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge.
This civil action brought by the United States under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-1968, is now before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Defendant British American Tobacco (Investments) Limited’s (“BATCo’s”) Compliance [Dkt. No. 5847] and Defendant BATCo’s Motion for Reconsideration [Dkt. No. 5849]. Upon consideration of the respective Motions, Oppositions, Replies, and the entire record herein, and for the reasons stated below, Plaintiffs Motion to Compel is granted in part and denied…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Morrison v. National Australia Bank Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- CGC Holding Co. v. Broad & CasselCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Chevron Corp. v. DonzigerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- In Re Toyota Motor Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2011
- Hourani v. MirtchevDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- United States v. Chao Fan XuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.