Hicks v. Norton

This is an action by an agent to recover, under an alleged contract, commissions for the sale of land. The case was tried without a jury, and resulted in a judgment for appellee, the defendant below.

Appellant’s first, second, third, and fourth assignments of error assail the judgment of the court as contrary to and unsupported by the evidence.

We have carefully read and considered the record, and find the conclusions of fact and law by the trial court, upon which he based his judgment, to be so admirably clear, concise, and correct that we adopt them as our opinion:

Findings of Fact.

“G. W.…