Bates v. E.D. Bullard Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT, Judge.
It The plaintiff, who contracted silicosis as a result of his exposure to silica dust in his employment as a sandblaster, and his wife appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing their claims against the defendants that supplied sand to his employer for sandblasting. For the following reasons, we affirm.
FACTS
Wilbert Bates was employed by SBA Shipyards for the period 1980-1989. During that time, Mr. Bates’ work duties included cleaning and/or sandblasting, both of which exposed him to silica dust. In June 2009, Mr. Bates was diagnosed with silicosis, a lung…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Champagne v. WardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Halphen v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
- Sadowski v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fernandez v. Tamko Building Products, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2014
- Nearhood v. Anytime Fitness-KingsvilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022
- Labarre v. Bienville Auto Parts, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022
- Ramos v. BrenntAG SpecialtiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.