Legal Opinion

Bates v. E.D. Bullard Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 5, 2011No. 11-187PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PICKETT, Judge.

It The plaintiff, who contracted silicosis as a result of his exposure to silica dust in his employment as a sandblaster, and his wife appeal the trial court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing their claims against the defendants that supplied sand to his employer for sandblasting. For the following reasons, we affirm.

FACTS

Wilbert Bates was employed by SBA Shipyards for the period 1980-1989. During that time, Mr. Bates’ work duties included cleaning and/or sandblasting, both of which exposed him to silica dust. In June 2009, Mr. Bates was diagnosed with silicosis, a lung…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Champagne v. WardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  3. Halphen v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1986
  4. Sadowski v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Fernandez v. Tamko Building Products, Inc.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 2014
  2. Nearhood v. Anytime Fitness-KingsvilleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Cortez v. Lamorak Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022
  4. Labarre v. Bienville Auto Parts, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2022
  5. Ramos v. BrenntAG SpecialtiesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API