Legal Opinion

Andreassen v. Esposito

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 28, 1966PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

90 N.J. Super. 170 (1966)

216 A.2d 607

ALF ANDREASSEN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

MICHAEL P. ESPOSITO, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued November 8, 1965.

Decided January 28, 1966.

Before Judges GAULKIN, LABRECQUE and BROWN.

Mr. Herbert E. Greenstone argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Greenstone & Greenstone, attorneys).

Mr. Garret A. Hobart, IV, argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Schenck, Price, Smith & King, attorneys; Mr. William R. Albrecht, on the brief).

The opinion of the court was delivered by BROWN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff appeals from a jury verdict…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Vadurro v. Yellow Cab Co. of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. Ford v. ReichertSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  3. Boykin v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Batts v. Joseph Newman, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  5. Lemons v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fielder v. StonackSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Huddell v. LevinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1975
  3. Bierczynski v. RogersSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
  4. Santillan v. PettitMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Farmers Insurance Exchange v. PetersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API