Legal Opinion

Harsh v. Cure Feeders, L.L.C.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided June 2, 2005No. 04CA0240PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge ROY.

Plaintiff, L.L. Harsh, appeals the trial court’s judgment finding defendant, Cure Feeders, L.L.C., liable, but awarding only $150 for one day of grazing by 500 head of defendant’s cattle entering upon plaintiffs land. We reverse and remand for an award for the damages to plaintiffs crops and for additional damages that arose from a fertilizer spill caused by the trespassing cattle.

Plaintiff farmed nine fields irrigated by separate center pivot sprinkler systems. The subject field comprised 165.5 acres which were planted to corn. The field was protected by an outer…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ballow v. PHICO Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. Robinson v. KerrSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  3. Guardianship of ReynoldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Boettcher & Co., Inc. v. MunsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  5. Hoover v. ShottSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Banning v. PresterColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  2. Hawley v. MowattColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Bailey v. Shell Western E & P, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API