Legal Opinion

Park City Amusements v. Frog Pond, Inc., No. Cv94 0310493s (Feb. 16, 1995)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 16, 1995No. CV94 0310493SUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISIONRE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (#124) The defendant moves for summary judgment in this action to recover for breach of a contract to maintain video games in a bar, on the ground (1) that the contract is unenforceable because it was induced by fraud, (2) that the contract is unenforceable because of the statute of frauds, and (3) that the contract is unenforceable because it was not recorded as a land deed.

The following facts are pertinent to a consideration of this motion:

On August 12, 1994, the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  3. Yanow v. Teal Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  4. Bartha v. Waterbury House Wrecking Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  5. Wadia Enterprises, Inc. v. HirschfeldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API