Legal Opinion

Kniss v. Holbrook

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 17, 1896No. 1,623PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Noble Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGavin, J.

This is an action brought by appellees against appellant upon a promissory note executed to one Brainard, payable to him or bearer at a bank in this State, which was duly assigned to appellees before maturity. Appellant filed an answer of six paragraphs. The third paragraph avers: That the consideration of the note vas the sale and transfer to appellant and another of a certain patent right and that there was no clause or words in said note stating that the same was given for a patent right “by reason of which failure and omission said note was and is invalid and void.”

The 4th paragraph -was…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Owen v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Landwerlen v. WheelerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Payne v. . BurnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Morris v. SternIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Phœnix Mutual Life Insurance v. HinesleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gregory v. ArmsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Field v. NoblettIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Calahan v. DunkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Hardison v. MannIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Pritchett v. AhrensIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API