Gould v. Castel
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Gratiot. Bill to quiet title. Defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Graves, O. J.
In April, 1880, the conrplainant filed a bill against the defendant for the purpose of quieting the title to certain lands claimed by complainant and against which, as he alleged, the defendant had created a cloud by certain claims which were not founded in any legal or *605equitable right. A subpoena to answer was in due form immediately issued and on the 17th of April was returned with regular proof of service on the defendant personally. The service was made by Mr. Bassett, and some time thereafter, and after that gentleman had mailed the subpoena to the complainant’s solicitor…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Elmendorf v. City of San AntonioTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Low v. MillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Saint Louis Clay Products Co. v. ChristopherWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
- Foster v. TalbotMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Long v. LongMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.