Legal Opinion
Rainerman v. EAGLE NAT. BANK OF MIAMI
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 11, 1989No. 88-1302PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
541 So.2d 740 (1989)
Arturo RAINERMAN, Appellant,
v.
EAGLE NATIONAL BANK OF MIAMI, Appellee.
No. 88-1302.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
April 11, 1989.
Myles J. Tralins, Miami, for appellant.
Holland & Knight and Luis O'Naghten, Miami, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and FERGUSON, JJ.
2Per curiam
Appellant, Arturo Rainerman, contends that it is sufficient, in order to sustain a claimed fifth-amendment privilege, to show that the nature of the proceeding, or setting where the claim is made, is such that a response to any relevant question might be incriminating. See Compton…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Pillsbury Co. v. ConboySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Delisi v. SmithDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Stewart v. MussolineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by14 opinions
- Magid v. WinterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Novak v. SniedaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Sugarmill Woods Civic Ass'n v. SOUTHERN STATESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Kanji v. ValliDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
- Taubert v. State, Office of the Attorney GeneralDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.