Legal Opinion

Lindsey v. Matayoshi

District Court, D. Hawaii

Decided June 19, 2013No. Civil No. 11-00713 JMS-KSCPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

J. MICHAEL SEABRIGHT, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On November 28, 2011, Plaintiffs Heather Lindsey (“Lindsey”) and Geremy K. Lopez, individually and as guardians ad litem for RFL,. their minor daughter, (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), filed this action against Kathryn S. Matayoshi in her official capacity as State Superintendent, Department of Education (“Matayoshi”); Kanu O Ka ’Aina New Century Public *1162Charter School (“Kanu”); and Pat Bergin (“Bergin”), Allyson Tamura (“Tamura”), and Keomailani Case (“Case”) in their official and…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Patrick v. Success Acad. Charter Sch., Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
  2. United States v. Minnesota Transitions Charter SchoolsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
  3. McKinney ex rel. K.P. v. Huntsville Sch. Dist.District Court, S.D. New York · 2018
  4. Abing v. EversDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2021
  5. Daniels v. Novant Health IncDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2023

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API