Seamans v. Zimmerman
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Clayton District Court — Hon. W. A. Hoyt, Judge. Action at law to recover the amount of certain assessments made according to the provisions of a policy of insurance, A demurrer to one of the divi•sionsi of the answer was overruled. The plaintiff ■elected to stand on the demurrer, and appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
The plaintiff is the receiver of the Wisconsin Mutual Fire Insurance Company, which is a •corporation organized under the laws of the state of Wisconsin, having its principal place of business in Milwaukee. It never had any office or agency in this •state for the transaction of any business whatever. On the twentieth day of June, 1890, the defendant made two written applications to the company at Milwaukee for insurance on certain property located at Gruttenberg, in this state, where the defendant resided. *364The company accepted the applications in Milwaukee-on the day specified, and issued to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clay Fire & Marine Insurance v. Huron Salt & Lumber Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Ætna Insurance v. HarveyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- American Insurance v. StoyMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Pennypacker v. Capital InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
- Columbus Insurance v. WalshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Katz v. HerrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
- Seamans v. Temple Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Seamans v. Christian Bros. Mill Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- State ex rel. Hart-Parr Co. v. Robb-Lawrence Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1906
- Presbyterian Ministers' Fund v. ThomasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.