Legal Opinion
Gardner v. Nizer
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 30, 1975No. 73 Civ. 4982PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BONSAL, District Judge.
Defendants’ attorneys, Messrs. Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon (“Phillips, Nizer”) for Louis Nizer and Messrs. Satterlee & Stephens for Doubleday & Company, Inc. (“Doubleday”), each move for costs and attorneys’ fees for services rendered and disbursements. 17 U.S.C. § 116. Phillips, Nizer applies for $12,999.62 in attorneys’ fees and $593.26 in disbursements, and Satterlee & Stephens applies for $4,000 in attorneys’ fees and $300 in disbursements.
This action was instituted by plaintiff Virginia Gardner for alleged statutory copyright infringement.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lewis Orgel and the Michie Company v. Clark Boardman Co., Ltd., and Alfred D. JahrCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Cloth v. HymanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Breffort v. I Had a Ball CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Gardner v. NizerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Baccaro v. PisaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. Roxbury Data Interface, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1977
- Wainwright Securities Inc. v. Wall Street Transcript Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Grosset & Dunlap, Inc. v. Gulf & Western Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Weissmann v. FreemanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988