Philip Hano & Co. v. Heller
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Seventh District. Action by Philip Hano & Co. against Max Heller. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.
The plaintiffs rested, having failed to prove its cause of action, and judgment absolute was given for the defendant against the plaintiffs. The judgment should have been directed dismissing the complaint without prejudice to a new action. Municipal Court Act (Laws 1902, c. 580) § 248, subd. 4; Ætna Life Ins. Co. v. Duparquet H. & M. Co., 53 Misc. Rep. 581, 103 N. Y. Supp. 800; Egyptian Flag Cigarette Co. v. Comisky, 40 Misc. Rep. 236, 81 N. Y. Supp. 673; Kieffer v. Met. St. Ry. Co., 31 Misc. Rep. 780, 65 N. Y. Supp. 228; Merkin v. Gersh, 30 Misc. Rep. 758, 63 N. Y. Supp. 75. There is no…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bowen v. FarleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- Merkin v. GershAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1900
- Egyptian Flag Cigarette Co. v. ComiskyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903
- Aetna Line Insurance v. Duparquet, Huot & Moneuse Co.New York Supreme Court · 1907
- Kieffer v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1900
3Cited by1 opinion
- Quattrone v. SimonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1913