Legal Opinion

Currie v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 1, 1911PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action to recover damages for the destruction by fire of the lumber plant of the plaintiff, on Sunday, 20 May, 1910.

At the conclusion of the evidence the defendant moved for (421) judgment of nonsuit, which was denied, and the defendant excepted.

The defendant requested the court to give the following instructions, which were refused, and the defendant excepted:

"That although from the evidence introduced by the plaintiff, which raises the presumption of negligence, that the defendant did set fire to the property of the plaintiffs, yet the court charges you that, upon all the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Aycock v. Raleigh & Augusta Air-Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  2. Cox v. Aberdeen & Asheboro R. R. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Williams v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  4. Deppe v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  5. Ellis v. Portsmouth & Roanoke Rail RoadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1841

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cashwell v. Fayetteville Pepsi-Cola Bottling WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  2. Aman v. Rowland Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Simmons v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Hardy v. . Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Hardy v. Hines Bros. LumberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API