Legal Opinion

United States v. Canto

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 29, 1980No. 79 CR 412Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER

COSTANTINO, District Judge.

Defendants, Prudencio Canto, Jorge Rios, Humberto Herrera (“Alvaro”) and Hernando Herrera, are charged with violating the federal narcotics laws.1 After reviewing the papers submitted and after reading the transcripts of the testimony given in court during the months of October, November, and December, the court finds that it must deny defendants’ motions to suppress various statements, identifications, and physical evidence obtained as a result of arrests and searches. Because of conflicting schedules and illnesses on the part of the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API