Putnam v. Keystone Bottle Stopper Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania
In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction. Suit by Henry W. Putnam and others against the Keystone Bottle-Stopper Company and others.
1Opinion of the CourtAcheson, J.
The bill of complaint charges the defendants with the infringement of two letters patent for improvements in bottle-stoppers, — - one granted to" Karl Hutter, assignee of Charles De Quillfeldt, being reissue No. 7,722, dated June 5, 1877, of original patent to De Quillfeldt, No. 158,406, dated January 5, 1875; and the other granted to William, Von Hofé, being patent No. 167,141, dated August 24, 1875. The-title of the plaintiffs to these patents is not controverted.
1. The'-De’ Qliillfeldt reissue, No. 7,722', lias nine claims, but in*235fringement of the first claim only is here alleged. That…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cantrell v. WallickSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Miller v. Brass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
3Cited by6 opinions
- Earl v. Southern Pac. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1896
- Mastoras v. HildrethCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
- New Jersey Wire Cloth Co. v. Buffalo Expanded Metal Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western New York · 1904
- Gamewell Fire Alarm Telegraph Co. v. Hackensack Improvement CommissionDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1912
- Taber Bas-Relief Photograph Co. v. MarceauU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.