Town Concrete Pipe of Washington, Inc. v. Redford
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Ringold, A.C.J.
Appellant, Walter E. Heller and Company, appeals the trial court's judgment that respondent, Art Redford d/b/a Redford Construction Company, is entitled to $20,000 damages as unjust enrichment.
This case presents three issues for consideration. Can a construction lender defeat a contractor's claim under RCW 60.04.210 by refusing to make further disbursements and foreclosing on the security? Did enactment of RCW 60.04-.210 abolish unjust enrichment as a remedy available to contractors against lenders? Did the court err in concluding that the doctrine of unjust enrichment was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Orwick v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- National Bank v. Equity InvestorsWashington Supreme Court · 1973
- Chandler v. Washington Toll Bridge AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Chemical Bank v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Gee v. EberleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Lynch v. Deaconess Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Lumberman's of Washington, Inc. v. BarnhardtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- Schumacher Painting Co. v. First Union Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Ehsani v. McCullough Family PartnershipWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- Ehsani v. McCullough Family PartnershipWashington Supreme Court · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.