Legal Opinion

Town Concrete Pipe of Washington, Inc. v. Redford

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 23, 1986No. 13534-1-IPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ringold, A.C.J.

Appellant, Walter E. Heller and Company, appeals the trial court's judgment that respondent, Art Redford d/b/a Redford Construction Company, is entitled to $20,000 damages as unjust enrichment.

This case presents three issues for consideration. Can a construction lender defeat a contractor's claim under RCW 60.04.210 by refusing to make further disbursements and foreclosing on the security? Did enactment of RCW 60.04-.210 abolish unjust enrichment as a remedy available to contractors against lenders? Did the court err in concluding that the doctrine of unjust enrichment was…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Orwick v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. National Bank v. Equity InvestorsWashington Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Chandler v. Washington Toll Bridge AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Chemical Bank v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Gee v. EberleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Deaconess Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Lumberman's of Washington, Inc. v. BarnhardtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  3. Schumacher Painting Co. v. First Union Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  4. Ehsani v. McCullough Family PartnershipWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Ehsani v. McCullough Family PartnershipWashington Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API