Vera Cruz v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
District Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
SWYGERT, Chief Judge.
The Indiana Wrongful Death Act (Burns’ Ind.Stats.Anno. § 2-404) and the Indiana statute allowing recovery by a parent for the loss of services of a child (Burns’ Ind.Stats.Anno. § 2-217) create independent and mutually exclusive actions. They neither afford optionally alternative remedies nor are they actions that can be pursued together. Mayhew v. Burns, 1885, 103 Ind. 328, 2 N.E. 793; Hahn v. Moore, 1956, 127 Ind.App. 149, 133 N.E.2d 900, 904; Note, Wrongful Death Actions in Indiana, 34 Ind.L.J. 108.
In the case at bar the action has been brought by the father of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mayhew v. BurnsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- HAHN v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1956
- Thompson v. Town of Fort BranchIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
- Myron Herrick v. David Knight Sayler, Administrator, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Clevenger v. KernIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Maroon v. State, Department of Mental HealthIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Cahoon v. CummingsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- Sansone v. Ocean Accident and Guarantee Corp.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1964
- Estate of Sears Ex Rel. Sears v. GriffinIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
- Davidson v. John Deere & Co.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.