Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hurd v. Williamsburg County

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 17, 2003No. 3614Published

1DissentCureton, J.

I respectfully dissent.

I

The majority contends that Hurd produced sufficient evidence to establish that he was let off the bus in an unreasonably dangerous location. I disagree.

At trial, Hurd offered the deposition of Booker Pressley, the former director of Williamsburg County’s transit authority. *617Pressley stated that the area in which the “Park and Ride” was created was congested. Pressley attested that the “Park and Ride” was created so that the passengers would not have to cross the road to go to Mingo’s store, and it was also established to provide the County with a safer place to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bloom v. RavoiraSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Harris v. Atlantic Greyhound CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Singletary v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
  4. Flynn Ex Rel. Estate of Hoffman v. Carolina Scenic StagesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API