McQuillen v. A. R. Hyde & Sons Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
McLELLAN, District Judge.
This suit was brought in April, 1938, for infringement of design patent No. 100,174, and for unfair competition. In the original complaint, infringement of a second design patent, No. 100,175, was also charged, but at the pre-trial hearing, on motion of the plaintiffs and with the consent of the defendant, the charge on this patent was dismissed. The plaintiffs are Roy M. Mc-Quillen, the patentee, and The Hobby Shoe Company, Inc., the latter an exclusive H-. censee under the patent in suit. The plaintiff McQuillen is a citizen of New Hampshire; the plaintiff…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gorham Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Applied Arts Corp. v. Grand Rapids Metalcraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- Knapp v. Will & Baumer Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Cahoone Barnet Manuf'g Co. v. Rubber & Celluloid Harness Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1891
- Illinois Watch Case Co. v. Hingeco Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rowley v. TresenbergDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1941
- Tappan Co. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1965