Legal Opinion

Runyan v. City of Henryetta

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 15, 1959No. 38525PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Vice Chief Justice. •

Plaintiffs in error, referred to hereinafter-as plaintiffs, sued the City of Henryetta,. referred to herein as defendant. The court, on trial, sustained a demurrer to plaintiffs’" evidence. Plaintiffs appeal from such ad- • verse judgment.-

The City of Henryetta constructed a reservoir on Wolf Creek, a meandering intermittent stream, for its water supply. In< connection with the purification of this ■ water, the city uses four settling basins, below or near the dam. Water in these - basins is treated with aluminum sulphate and hydrated line. These chemicals,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Coleman v. BennettTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Carter, Adm'r v. PinkertonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  3. Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SicklesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  4. City of Henryetta v. RunyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
  5. City of Henryetta v. RunyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Oldham Ex Rel. OldhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  2. City of Henryetta v. RunyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Oldham Ex Rel. OldhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  4. Phoenix Insurance Co. v. Jade Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
  5. Stiles v. AlbeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API