Runyan v. City of Henryetta
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAMS, Vice Chief Justice. •
Plaintiffs in error, referred to hereinafter-as plaintiffs, sued the City of Henryetta,. referred to herein as defendant. The court, on trial, sustained a demurrer to plaintiffs’" evidence. Plaintiffs appeal from such ad- • verse judgment.-
The City of Henryetta constructed a reservoir on Wolf Creek, a meandering intermittent stream, for its water supply. In< connection with the purification of this ■ water, the city uses four settling basins, below or near the dam. Water in these - basins is treated with aluminum sulphate and hydrated line. These chemicals,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coleman v. BennettTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
- Carter, Adm'r v. PinkertonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Local Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SicklesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- City of Henryetta v. RunyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
- City of Henryetta v. RunyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Oldham Ex Rel. OldhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- City of Henryetta v. RunyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Oldham Ex Rel. OldhamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Phoenix Insurance Co. v. Jade Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
- Stiles v. AlbeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962