Boaz v. Latson
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Presiding Judge.
Darrell and Carolyn Boaz sued attorney William Latson for fraud, fraudulent foreclosure, and slander of title. Latson moved for summary judgment on all claims, and the trial court granted his motion. For reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court’s ruling as to the fraud claim, but reverse as to the fraudulent foreclosure and slander of title claims.
We review the trial court’s summary judgment ruling de novo, construing the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party. So viewed, the evidence shows that, in 1994, Darrell…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Pfeiffer v. Georgia Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- Hodge v. SADA Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Hunter, MacLean, Exley & Dunn, P.C. v. FrameSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Paul v. DestitoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Calhoun First National Bank v. DickensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Latson v. BoazSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Morgan v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2011
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Simmons v. FutralCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- In Re InterBank Funding Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.