Legal Opinion

Wade v. Ray

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 20, 1913No. 3290PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from County Court, Oklahoma County; Sam Hooker, Judge. Action by T. H. Ray against M. E. Wade. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

This suit is on a note for $176. The plaintiff below, Ray, was awarded judgment for the sum claimed on the verdict of a jury. The defendant below, Wade, appeals.

The note was in the form frequently used by venders of farming implements and machinery, and contained a clause reserving title in the vendor, and providing that, under certain con ditions named, the vendor could retake the chattels sold, and sell the same and apply the proceeds as a credit on the note. The blank for a description of the chattels was not filled in. The defendant admitted the execution and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sullins v. DomerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Hughes v. SenterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Dimmers v. ReganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API