Legal Opinion

Carter v. Malken

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 4, 2017No. 4D16-21PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMay, J.

It takes two incidents of harassment to satisfy the requirements for an injunction against stalking. The respondent appeals an injunction entered against him. He argues the court erred in entering the injunction because the petitioner failed to prove at least two incidents of harassment. We agree and reverse.

A dispute over a will and the disposition of property lies at the heart of this litigation. The decedent’s son [“petitioner”] petitioned for an injunction for protection against stalking against his sister’s significant other [“respondent”]. The petition alleged that: (1) on October 4,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Slack v. KlingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  2. Wyandt v. VoccioDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. Joseph Lawrence O'Neill v. Sara Skye GoodwinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  4. Laserinko v. GerhardtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pickett v. CopelandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
  2. BIROL OZYESILPINAR v. HASSAN JALALIDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
  3. Benhalima v. IakovenkoFlorida Second District Court of Appeal · 2026
  4. Joshua David Lee v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  5. Terrance J. Pickett v. Holly C. CopelandDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API