Legal Opinion

Lucero v. Hensley

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 18, 1996No. CV 94-6780-R (RMC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

REAL, District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint and other papers along with the attached Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and has made a de novo determination of the Report and Recommendation.

IT IS ORDERED that:(1) The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;(2) Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment is DENIED;(3) Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part, as follows: Summary Judgment is granted…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hasbrouck v. Yavapai, County ofDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
  2. Robert Damon Epps v. LACDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
  3. Turner v. HamblinDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API