Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. McNair

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 1996Published

1Dissent

Chief Judge Kaye

(dissenting). Convicted for the third time of the felony of driving while intoxicated (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192), defendant — an admitted alcoholic — received a sentence of five years’ probation, the first six months of which were to be served in jail, followed by a one-year period of electronic home monitoring. Because we conclude that the electronic monitoring imposed was well within the sentencing court’s statutory discretion under Penal Law § 65.10, we respectfully dissent.

Penal Law § 65.10 (1) states as a general proposition that conditions of probation "shall be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. LetterloughNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. HowlandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. People v. RyanNassau County District Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API