Parrish v. Uzzell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
The trial court found that, pursuant to the provisions of G.S. 1A-1, Rule 41(a)(1), the dismissal of plaintiff’s second action operated as an adjudication on the merits of her claim, thereby barring her right to maintain any further action based on the same claim. We do not agree and accordingly reverse.
G.S. 1A-1, Rule 41(a), entitled “Voluntary dismissal; effect thereof,” contains two subsections as follows:(1) By Plaintiff; by Stipulation. — Subject to the provisions of Rule 23(c) and of any statute of this State, an action or any claim therein may be dismissed by the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Trull v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Bradshaw v. Citizens National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
3Cited by13 opinions
- Pintavalle v. ValkanosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- City of Raleigh v. College Campus Apartments, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. BondurantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Centura Bank v. WintersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Kuhn v. WilliamsonDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.