Legal Opinion
Mote v. WORKERS'COMP. APPEALS BD., KIMSTOCK, INC.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 24, 1997No. B104490PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GILBERT, J.
The following case demonstrates what happens when the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board unreasonably denies a variety of penalties.
Petitioner Raymon Mote suffered industrial injuries and seeks workers’ compensation. The workers’ compensation judge (WCJ) found that Mote is entitled to indemnity for temporary total disability (TTD) and further medical treatment. Mote filed a petition to impose multiple penalties for failure and delay in paying TTD, unreasonable delay in increasing the rate of TTD and failure to provide medical and psychiatric care, among other things. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kerley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- McAllister v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Gallamore v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Western Growers Insurance v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Greener v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Keulen v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Gangwish v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- County of Sacramento v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Henry v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Atascadero Unified School District v. Workers' Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.