Legal Opinion

Zincoris v. Hobart Bros. Co.(of Ohio)

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 12, 1993No. 1-92-0482PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Giannis

Plaintiff sought recovery from defendants Hobart Brothers Company (hereinafter Hobart Ohio), Hobart Corporation (hereinafter Hobart Illinois), and Hobart North Welding Supply, Inc. (hereinafter Hobart North), for personal injuries sustained while he used a welding device during the course of his employment. The court dismissed with prejudice plaintiff’s claims against defendant Hobart North because they were not brought within the applicable limitations period. The court also dismissed with prejudice plaintiff’s claims against defendant Hobart Ohio for lack of diligence in effecting service…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Segal v. SaccoIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Penrod v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Alsobrook v. CoteAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
  4. Behr v. Club Med, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. Greig v. GriffelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Plooy v. ParyaniAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  2. Augustus v. Estate of SomersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  3. Kole v. BrubakerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
  4. Marks v. Rueben H. Donnelley, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  5. Tatara v. Peterson Diving ServiceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API