Legal Opinion
Maxwell v. Carl Bierbaum, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas
Decided February 22, 1995No. CA 94-401Published
1Opinion of the Court
893 S.W.2d 346 (1995)
48 Ark.App. 159
George MAXWELL, Appellant,
v.
CARL BIERBAUM, INC., and CIGNA, Appellees.
No. CA 94-401.
Court of Appeals of Arkansas, En Banc.
February 22, 1995.
Kenneth A. Harper, Monticello, for appellant.
Shackleford, Shackleford & Phillips, El Dorado, for appellees.
PITTMAN, Judge.
George Maxwell appeals from an order of the Arkansas Workers' Compensation Commission denying his claim for benefits sought in connection with his development of the tick-borne Lyme disease. Appellant contends that the Commission erred in finding that Lyme disease is not a compensable occupational…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wade v. Mr. C. Cavenaugh'sSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Williams v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1979
- Sanyo Manufacturing Corp. v. LeisureCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
- Osmose Wood Preserving v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1992
- Maxwell v. Carl Bierbaum, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.