Legal Opinion

Cheryl & Co. v. Krueger

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided September 10, 2020No. 2:18-cv-01485Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CHERYL & CO., Civil Action 2:18-cv-01485 Plaintiff, Judge Edmund A. Sargus, Jr. Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson v. CHERYL L. KRUEGER, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER The instant matter is before the Court for consideration of a motion to dismiss filed by Defendant Elisabeth Allwein (“Allwein”) (ECF No. 106), as well as a motion to dismiss filed by Plaintiff Cheryl & Co. (“Cheryl Co.”). (ECF No. 110). Allwein moves to dismiss Cheryl Co.’s sole remaining claim against her, which is the civil conspiracy claim…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Directv, Inc. And Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. Mark Treesh, Commissioner for the Department of Revenue for the State of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Vivian J. Scheid v. Fanny Farmer Candy Shops, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  5. Hooks v. HooksCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API