Legal Opinion

Smith v. Bald Hill Coal Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 1, 1941No. Appeal, 199PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Patteeson,

This is a proceeding instituted by a writ of scire facias to revive and continue the lien of a judgment entered by the prothonotary, in the Court of Common Pleas of Clearfield County, on June 26, 1935, against the Bald Hill Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, allegedly pursuant to an agreement of the parties which has been lost. The notation of the judgment reads as follows: “Lease dated July 1, 1917. By papers filed plaintiffs and defendant do agree that Prothonotary shall enter judgment in favor of plaintiffs and against defendant in the sum of $12,250 with…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Moll v. LaffertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. First National Bank and Tr. Co. v. LaubachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Brundred v. EgbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
  4. O'Connor v. FlickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Davidson v. ThorntonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1847

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Triangle Building Supplies & Lumber Co. v. ZermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Green Ridge Bank v. EdwardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Green Ridge Bank v. EdwardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Green Ridge Bank v. EdwardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. TRIANGLE BLDG. SUP. & L. CO. v. ZermanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API