Legal Opinion

Rosenberg v. Groov-Pin Corp.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided June 19, 1935No. E-7541PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BYERS, District Judge.

Motions in a patent cause, by plaintiffs for a preliminary injunction, and by defendant to dismiss as to two of the plaintiffs’ patents. These will be considered together.

The bill alleges that the following patents, which were issued to Rosenberg, have been infringed by the defendant, and the co-plaintiff is the sole licensee of said patents:

United States Letters Patent No. 1,482,-151,

United States Letters Patent No. 1,545,-471,

United States Letters Patent No. 1,686,-468,

United States Letters Patent No. 1,912,-222,

United States Letters Patent No. 1,978,-145.

Of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hill v. WoosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Rosenberg v. John Hassall, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Spectrum Scientifics, LLC v. Celestron Acquisition, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API