McNamara v. Ellis
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Floyd Court of Common Pleas.
1Per curiam
Suit upon a note commenced by attachment. The defendant appeared and moved to dismiss the attachment, because the affidavit was as the affiant “verily believed.” The motion was overruled. The affidavit was sufficient. Trew v. Gaskill, 10 Ind. R. 265.
The defendant answered, and filed interrogatories, and took a rule generally for a reply. Perhaps this did not amount to a rule to answer interrogatories.
The plaintiff replied to the answer, but did not answer the interrogatories. No steps were taken to compel an answer; but a motion was made to dismiss the cause, because the interrogatories were…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Champ v. KendrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Dunn v. CrockerIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- Cassiday Fork Boom & Lumber Co. v. TerryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
- Alexander v. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Ross, Keen & Co. v. SteenSupreme Court of Florida · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.