Legal Opinion

Hancock v. Secretary of State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 31, 1994No. WD 50120PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

The Missouri Secretary of State and the Committee for Legislative Research (the Committee) appeal from the judgment finding the fiscal note summary prepared by the Committee to be insufficient and unfair and substituting the court’s draft of the fiscal note summary to appear on the ballots of the general election as Proposition 7, November 8, 1994. The principal issue presented is whether the trial court erred in declaring the fiscal note summary prepared by the Committee as Proposition 7, commonly referred to as “Hancock II,” insufficient and unfair. § 116.190, RSMo Supp.1993. 1

The parties…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Buechner v. BondSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  3. Laux v. Motor Carriers Council of St. Louis, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  4. State Ex Rel. Rice v. BishopMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Missouri Commission on Human RightsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Brown v. Missouri Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  2. Cures Without Cloning v. PundMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. Overfelt v. McCaskillMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. M.F.M. v. J.O.M.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Missouri Municipal League v. CarnahanMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API