Legal Opinion

Nunez v. Borden

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 23, 1933No. 6 Div. 300PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

When a claim of exemption is made by a judgment debtor to funds in the hands of a garnishee in a garnishment writ issued on such judgment, he must accompany his claim with a “statement setting forth the personal property, choses in action and money, and the location and value thereof,” duly verified. Section 7908, Code. “The purpose of the requirement is to prevent the defendant, while claiming the money garnished as exempt, secreting other personal property, money, or choses in action subject to his debts, and which may be reached by appropriate legal process.” Decatur…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Birmingham v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  2. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
  3. Cocciola v. Wood-Dickerson Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1902
  4. Davis & Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  5. Hurst v. Bell & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1882

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. ReavesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. Abramson v. HardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  3. Department of Industrial Relations v. DrummondAlabama Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. Carr v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Hamrick v. Town of AlbertvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API