Legal Opinion

Van Marel v. Watson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1925No. Civil No. 2271PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALISTER, C. J.

(After Stating the Facts as Above.) — The first assignment is that the court erred in overruling the demurrer to the complaint. This contention is based on the fact that Watson Brothers, the payees in the note, assigned and transferred it to the Western States Securities Company and guaranteed its payment, and, -when the amount due thereon was paid by them in compliance with their guaranty and the note taken back, the company did not indorse or reassign it.

When snit is brought on a note by the payee thereof, however, it is not necessary that he allege he is its owner and holder, but it is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dugan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1818
  2. Pinney v. McGregoryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  3. Winton Motor Carriage Co. v. Broadway Automobile Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Northern State Bank v. BellamyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Tuskaloosa Cotton-Seed Oil Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1887

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Kearby v. Western States Securities Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1926
  2. McClellan Mortgage Co. v. StoreyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  3. Albergo v. GigliottiUtah Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Security Insurance Co. of New Haven v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  5. Western States Securities Co. v. MosherArizona Supreme Court · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API