Legal Opinion

Carter v. Christie

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 5, 1896No. 9061PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Marion District Court. Son. Luden Liarle, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnston, J.

This was an action upon the bond given by John S. Christie as surviving partner of the late firm of Christie & Carter. The firm was engaged in the banking business from June, 1886, until July 8, 1887, when S. F. Carter, a member of the partnership, died intestate. M. A. Carter, his widow and sole heir, was appointed administratrix of the estate, and John S.. Christie, the surviving partner, was appointed and for a time acted as co-administrator; but he subsequently resigned, and M. A. Carter became, sole administratrix of th.e estate. After the decease of Carter, Christie carried on the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. Klemp v. WinterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  3. Kothman v. MarksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  4. Insley v. ShireSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  5. Stratton v. McCandlessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hudson v. BarrattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  2. Burris v. BurrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. Pickens v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Gordon v. MunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. Knox v. KnoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API