Legal Opinion

Meek v. Metropolitan Dade County

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 26, 1993No. 92-4852PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from the district court’s denial of a post-judgment motion to intervene for purposes of appeal. Having found that the at-large voting system used by Dade County, Florida (“Dade County”), to elect the members of its County Commission dilutes black and hispanic voting power in violation of section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 42 U.S.C. § 1973, the district court barred further elections. *1475The intervenors, who were denied leave to intervene as parties below, contend that the district court erred in condemning the at-large system under section 2 as construed in Thornburg…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Michigan State Afl-Cio v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  2. Daggett v. Commission on Governmental Ethics & Election PracticesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  3. Flying J, Inc. v. Van HollenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  4. Meek v. Metropolitan Dade CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Solid Waste Agency Of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps Of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API