Meek v. Metropolitan Dade County
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
This is an appeal from the district court’s denial of a post-judgment motion to intervene for purposes of appeal. Having found that the at-large voting system used by Dade County, Florida (“Dade County”), to elect the members of its County Commission dilutes black and hispanic voting power in violation of section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 42 U.S.C. § 1973, the district court barred further elections. *1475The intervenors, who were denied leave to intervene as parties below, contend that the district court erred in condemning the at-large system under section 2 as construed in Thornburg…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Michigan State Afl-Cio v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Daggett v. Commission on Governmental Ethics & Election PracticesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Flying J, Inc. v. Van HollenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Meek v. Metropolitan Dade CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- Solid Waste Agency Of Northern Cook County v. United States Army Corps Of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.