Mandacina v. Harrah's of North Kansas City
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtThomas H. Newton, Judge
Ms. Lucille Mandacina appeals an order of the Labor & Industrial Relations Commission affirming an appeals tribunal ruling denying her unemployment compensation benefits because she had voluntarily left work without good cause attributable to the work or the employer. Ms. Mandacina challenges the sufficiency of *100the evidence to support a finding that she voluntarily quit, and she argues that the evidence shows that she had good cause to “quit” her position as a casino table games dealer. We affirm.
Ms. Mandacina began her employment with Harrah’s North Kansas City in August 2010, working as a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Armco Steel Corp. v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission, Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Darr v. Roberts Marketing Group, LLCMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Board of Education of St. Louis v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission, Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Mauller v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Donzell Walker v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020
- Melanie L. Hill v. S.M. Huber Enterprises, Inc., and Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023