Legal Opinion

State v. Utter

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 2002No. S-01-677PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiller-Lerman, J.

I. NATURE OF CASE

Bennie L. Utter was convicted by a jury in the district court for Douglas County of two counts of possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver and one count of failure to affix a tax stamp. Utter appeals his convictions on the basis that the evidence introduced at trial was insufficient to establish that he had an intent to deliver or that he was a “dealer” subject to the marijuana and controlled substances tax statutes. We affirm Utter’s convictions for possession with intent to deliver but, due to insufficient evidence, reverse his conviction and sentence for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. KonfrstNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. ThomasNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. United States v. Kipp Michael McGeehan United States of America v. Timothy Steven JovanovicCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
  5. State v. FloresNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DraganescuNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. BakerNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. DonnerNebraska Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State v. WorthmanNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  5. State v. SAPANAJINNebraska Court of Appeals · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API